Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Oakland Ghost Ship Warehouse

1. In general, the Oakland Ghost Ship warehouse was known as a "labyrinth of artist studios." Throughout the two story structure, there were various rooms filled with sculptures, musical instruments, and acting props. The night of the fire, the second story was used as the setting of an electronic music party.

2. The fire is believed to have been caused by overloaded electrical lines at the rear of the structure. There were so many victims because there was no direct route from the stairs to the exit. From the bottom of the stairs, the path to the front door led around three pianos, requiring two left turns and a right turn to reach safety. This made it difficult for the people to find the exit, especially with the smoke from the fire. As a result, 36 people died, trapped in the flames.

3. In both the Oakland Ghost Ship fire and the Triangle Fire, the people in the buildings were struggling to find a way out. The people in the Ghost Ship warehouse couldn't find the exit because of the complex layout. The people in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory couldn't escape because the doors to the exit stairs had been locked. The only other ways out were the fire escape, which eventually collapsed, the elevator to Washington Square, which filled up very quickly, or by jumping to death.


Image result for oakland ghost ship warehouse fire




Monday, November 21, 2016

Wounded Knee Massacre


  • Wounded Knee Massacre
    • This source goes into great detail about the events leading up to the massacre and then talks about the casualties of the massacre. It can be used because it mainly explains what caused the Wounded Knee Massacre rather than going into detail about the massacre itself.
  • Wounded Knee
    • This source goes into more detail about the cause of the massacre at the scene (Wounded Knee Creek). It talks about what could have caused the massacre to break out rather than the events that took place leading up to the massacre, which makes it useful. 
The Wounded Knee Massacre was an event that took place at Wounded Knee Creek in 1890. One of the main contributors to the Wounded Knee Massacre was the Ghost Dance. The Ghost Dance was a spiritual movement that taught Indians that they had been defeated and forced to go to reservations because they angered the gods. The Lakota Sioux used the Ghost Dance as a way to discuss that the white man and his rule needed to be overthrown. The Sioux believed that a shirt known as the sacred ghost shirt would protect them from bullets during war. Sitting Bull was believed to be a Ghost Dancer. The whites tried to arrest him but killed him in the process, which caused the tensions between the whites and Indians at their reservation to increase. Another Sioux chief, Big Foot, and his band of Ghost Dancers (100 men, 200 women and children) were surrounded by 500 soldiers near Wounded Knee Creek. They were ordered to surrender their weapons, but they refused. As a result, fighting between the Ghost Dancers and the soldiers broke out. 150 Sioux, including Big Foot, were killed and another 50 were wounded. Only 25 soldiers died and 40 were wounded. The event is referred to as a battle but, in reality, it was an unnecessary massacre that could have easily been avoided.
Artist impression: A lithograph after a Painting of the Battle of Wounded Knee by W.M. Cary
Wounded Knee Massacre (link directly to picture)
Ghost Dance (link directly to picture)

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

Native Americans In-Class Work

In this activity, the first step was to find a definition of the words "savage" and "savagery." According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a savage is someone who is "not domesticated or under human control" and is "lacking the restraints normal to civilized human beings." According to the same dictionary, savagery is "a cruel or violent quality" or "a cruel or violent act or action." The next step was to read pages 18-21 of an online textbook passage from 1887. The final step was to use the search tool to find where the textbook refers to Indians as "savages" and read each of those passages.

If I were an American student reading this text as part of my schoolwork, I would probably view Native Americans as a group of people who were very independent and were not very aware of the world and people around them. One reason is because the Native Americans were very secluded to themselves. For example, they lived in huts made of poles and tree branches with their tribes and didn't come in contact with other people very often. I would also view the Native Americans as very hard-working, with the women doing all the work at the huts and the men doing all the hunting and fishing to provide food for their families. I would also think that the Indians were very violent. This is because the textbook says that the men were always carrying a number of weapons and were considered very brave if they had numerous large cuts and scars. Also, I would think that they were illiterate because it says that they had no books and only communicated among themselves by using figures. My final conclusion that would be made about Native Americans is that they were, well, savages. The textbook refers to Indians as savages about 19 times, and in most cases, it has to do with conflicts between the Indians (savages) and settlers. As a result of this, I would definitely think that Indians were under their own control and power rather than human control.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Letters from the West

1. This letter was written by a man who is traveling west. He is writing to his wife and baby about the land available to purchase in Nebraska where he plans on building a house. In the letter, he also talks about how he misses his wife and child very much. He wants to get the house built, so his family can come and live with him again.

2. One thing that stood out to me was how the man said that he was going to build his house out of sod and that it was a very effective method. He says that he has seen sod houses that have been made to look very nice by smoothing the sod, sweeping it with a broom until the grass roots stick out, and plastering it. He says, "They are just the most comfortable house to keep warm you ever seen." I found this very surprising because I didn't think that a house made of sod would be a very protective and warm house, but, according to the man, building a house with sod was very popular and very effective.

3. The act of letter writing at this point in time to people migrating west was extremely important, especially since paper wasn't very common. People used letter writing to write to their loved ones to inform them about the progress of their journey. It gave their loved ones a way to feel involved in the their life and journey. To loved ones, letter writing made them feel important because if they received a letter, they would know that their friend or family member was thinking about them on his or her journey and was willing to take the time out of their journey to write to them.

From the Atlantic to the Pacific, Overland
http://www.over-land.com/diarybarnes.html

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Glory/12 Years a Slave Essay

The filmmakers of the movies Glory and Twelve Years a Slave both faced the challenge of trying to create an inspirational and moving film about slavery and the Civil War, which they successfully did. They both faced the obstacle of a time limit to cram years of historical events into a two-hour timeline. Nevertheless, they were able to produce a movie that kept people glued to their seat. Even though some of the events that were shown in the movie were changed a little in order to create an entertaining movie that people would want to watch, the end result of both films was an honest, riveting two hours that gave viewers a better understanding of the events that took place during slavery and the Civil War. These movies are not only informational but also very accurate, which makes them a good source to use in a school classroom in order to help students get a better understanding of life during slavery and the Civil War. They are just as good, if not better, than textbooks because they allow the student to achieve the same goals and improve the same skills as reading a textbook does.
It is possible to be just as analytical in your thinking while watching a movie as it is while reading a textbook. While watching Glory, for example, I was able to analyze how white regiments felt about having black regiments in the Union Army. Whenever the two regiments interacted with each other, I was able to see that the white regiments did not have any respect for the black regiments; they felt like the black men were worthless and didn’t stand a chance at helping the war effort. This was shown by the white men repeatedly calling the black men the “n” word, even if a black man had a higher rank than the white man. Since the movie was able to create these types of scenes in order to give the viewer an understanding of the way black men were treated by white regiments, I wanted to do more research on the way black regiments were treated during the Civil War and whether or not they were successful in the war. According to ABC-Clio, I discovered that black regiments were given inferior weapons and health care, which is why over 37,000 black men died in service, 29,000 of which were from diseases. I also discovered that black men were paid $3 less than white men, which is something that the movie was able to show in a big scene where Shaw refused pay until his regiment received equal pay. I also discovered that 16 black men received the Medal of Honor, which proves that black regiments were a great help to the war effort and the defeat of the Confederacy. Because the movie sparked this curiosity in me, it proves that students can be very analytical in their thinking while watching movies.
Arguments can also be created while watching a movie, just like reading a textbook, and evidence can be used to support it. For example, while watching the movie 12 Years a Slave, I developed an argument that Solomon wasn’t just a character in the movie; he was a symbol for so many more people than just himself. This can be proved because, while reading a New York Times movie review, I came across a statement that said that in the movie, Solomon “represents all free black men that were kidnapped and forced into slavery.” This supports my argument because, in the movie, Solomon didn’t just want to be freed from slavery; he wanted to live. His desire for freedom is what drove him to never give up and to keep fighting for freedom. This is how all kidnapped slaves were; they wanted to regain their freedom because they knew that it was wrongly stolen from them. Solomon is a symbol for injustice throughout the movie, and he is also a symbol for all the men and women whose freedom was taken away from them. This proves that arguments can be made from movies and can be supported.
I understand that a filmmaker faces the difficult challenge of trying to take several years of historical events and trying to fit them all into a two-hour movie without changing the facts too much. However, by condensing all of the events, it keeps the audience engrossed by the action occurring on screen, ensuring that the audience stays in their seats and keeps watching the film. Also, by making certain historical events more intense and by killing off an important character during a war scene (like in Glory), it actually causes the audience to be empathetic towards the historical event and the people that experienced it. For example, according to a New York Times movie review on the movie Glory, it says that some of the events in the movie, especially the ones at Fort Wagner, were made more dramatic than described in Shaw’s real-life journal. This makes the movie much more interesting because if, for example, Shaw’s death wasn’t made a focus point in the movie, then the audience wouldn’t realize what caused the black regiment to suddenly surge and fearlessly attack the fort. By focusing on his death and the way his men reacted after his death, it shows that Shaw, a white man, was willing to give up his life for his regiment, proving that he truly cared for them. The way his regiment went on to charge into the fort after he was killed proves that his regiment respected his bravery and truly valued what Shaw had given up to put his men in a position to succeed. Filmmakers do have a disadvantage when it comes to fitting years of historical events into a two hour movie, but they have proven to do a very good job of making the most out of their time by creating an empathetic aspect that textbooks cannot do.
Textbooks do a very good job of giving students a good understanding of historical events and the facts of those events, but what they cannot do is create a sense of empathy for the reader towards the men and women that actually had to experience those events. The producers of Glory and 12 Years a Slave successfully created a connection between the audience and the characters in the movies in order to cause the audience to feel sorry for the people that actually had to endure slavery and fighting in the Civil War. The movies create a sense of chaos and brutality that is very similar to the way life was during these times. I believe that learning from movies is just as useful as learning from textbooks because the same goals are still able to be accomplished, like being analytical in your thinking and being able to create and support an argument.
Image result for attack on fort wagner





Image result for 54th massachusetts
                                                                           The 54th Massachusetts Infantry                        
Image result for solomon northup
           Solomon Northup
Works Cited
Berr, Jonathan. "The Surprising Success of "12 Years a Slave"" CBSNews. CBS Interactive, 7 Mar. 2014. Web. 23 Sept. 2016.
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-surprising-success-of-12-years-a-slave/>.
Canby, Vincent. "Black Combat Bravery in the Civil War." The New York Times. The New York Times, 14 Dec. 1989. Web. 23 Sept. 2016.
Dargis, Manohla. "The Blood and Tears, Not the Magnolias." The New York Times. The New York Times, 17 Oct. 2013. Web. 20 Sept. 2016. <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/18/movies/12-years-a-slave-holds-nothing-back-in-show-of-suffering.html?_r=0>.
"List of Glory Awards." IMDb. IMDb.com, n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2016. <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097441/awards?ref_=tt_awd>.
Slaughter, John. "The Roots of the Southern Workers and Poor." The Roots of the Southern Workers and Poor. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Sept. 2016. <http://www.lrna.org/2-pt/555/v16ed2art1_roots.html>.


Thursday, September 8, 2016

Twelve Years a Slave Paraphrasing Activity

"But films that are actually about American slavery are vanishingly rare — films that unpick slavery’s all-debasing power-plays, enumerate its everyday horrors, show us the rhythms and rituals that have left it lingering in that nation’s muscle memory. McQueen’s picture, nominated for 10 Baftas this week with Oscars sure to follow, does all of this, and could be the first of a new genre."

In this section of his movie review on Twelve Years a Slave, Robbie Collin said that there is a very small number of movies with the topic of American slavery being produced--meaning movies that truly focus on analyzing the different elements of the degrading tactics used by slave-owners on their slaves to enforce their power, movies that accurately depict the suffering that slaves suffered every single day, and movies that exhibit the brutality that slaves suffered, which is still on the minds of many Americans to this day. Twelve Years a Slave has the opportunity to win "ten Baftas" as well as a few "Oscar" awards because it accomplishes all of the goals previously listed that can make a film based on American slavery truly stand alone from all of the others.